http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/945 2026-04-10T20:45:52Z 2026-04-10T20:45:52Z تجاني الحاج حامد http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5400 2021-01-17T08:32:49Z 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z

Title: الصناعة الحديثية عند الحافظ ابن حجر العسقلاني (ت852ه) في كتابه التلخيص الحبير من أول كتاب الطهارة إلى آخر باب صلاة التطوع دراسة وصفية تحليلية Authors: تجاني الحاج حامد Abstract: This work attempts to study one of the most important books of Al-hafiz ibnHajar al-Asqalaani in Hadith Science entitled (Attalkhees Al-Habeer fi takhreej al-Hadith Arrafie al-kabeer) it examines all relevant aspects in Hadith science, The book is not duly studied except for few chapters by some scholars – Applied Hadith as an aspect of Hadith science in the intended book, is not studied. Therefore, this work tries to study this aspect (applied Hadith) in ibnHajar’s book (Attalkhees Al-Habeer). The study adopted inductive, descriptive, deductive, analytical and comparative methods- The work consists of an introduction and two chapters and each chapter consists of many sections. Finally, the study concluded to a number of findings among which are: the term applied Hadith science refers to all efforts in Hadith science made by Hadith classifier academic mastering of Hadith science in addition to all aspects related to applied science of Hadith. The intended book (Attalkhees Al-Habeer) is originated from Abu Hamid Al-qazali’s book (Al wajeez), which itself originated from Aljuaini’s book (Nihayat Al-mattlab fi dirayat Al-mazhab) and this later one is originated from Alshafie’s and his companions books (Alum, Al imlaa, mukhtasar- al-Buwaiti, and Mukhtasar Al- muzani).

2020-01-01T00:00:00Z لمياء سليمان عبدالقادر عكاشة http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5385 2021-01-12T10:41:46Z 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z

Title: الإشراق الروحي في فكر شهاب الدين السُهروردي في ضوء العقيدة الإسلامية Authors: لمياء سليمان عبدالقادر عكاشة Abstract: The title of this study is: Illumination Philosophy by Shihab Aldeen Al Suhrawardi in view if Islamic Aqida. This study aims to throw light upon the life of the founder of (Illumination Philosophy) Shihab Aldeen Al Suhrawardi, his philosophy, his sources and build-up of his philosophy. It also aims to study Illumination Philosophy in view of to Islamic Aqida. The study used mainly the historical and descriptive methodologies, in addition to analytical and comparative methodologies in order to make comparisons and extract conclusions. The objective of the study is to try to make Illumination Philosophy simpler and easy to understand by clarifying it in simple, current Arabic language. The second objective is to study the philosophy in light of Islamic Aqida The study is composed of four chapters, the first chapter contained the fundamentals of the study, whereas the second chapter included the bibliographical information of the author and his sources and manuscripts, the third chapter stated the components of the Philosophy and the forth chapter compared its components to Islamic beliefs. The study is concluded by results and recommendations.

2020-01-01T00:00:00Z عثمان محمد علي ابراهيم علي http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5370 2020-12-28T13:02:06Z 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z

Title: الصَّنَاعَةُ الحَدِيْثِيَّةُ عِنْدَ الحَافِظ ابن حَجَرٍ(ت852هـ) في كتاب التلخيص الحبير من أَول كتاب الإيلاء إلى آخر كتاب أُمَّهات الأَولاد :دراسة وصفية تحليلية Authors: عثمان محمد علي ابراهيم علي Abstract: book Attalkhees Alkhabeer. The study is intended to identify Hadith Making concept and scientific insights. It also sheds light on the author's life :his birth, early life, works, scholars'view towrds him and his death. On the other hand, the book is examined in terms of :its origin, description, academic value and importance owed by scholars. The statement of the problem is exemplifed in the fact that, although Hadith Making Art is fully present in the book, researchers never accounted in their studied its author's contribution in this respect. The entire research question in this work is :To what extend Hadith Making Art is present in Ibn Hajar's book Attalkhees Alkhabeer? The main research hypothesis :Attalkhees Alkhabeer is rich in Hadith Making Art and its author is one of the outstanding Hadith scholars. The study adopted inductive, descriptive analytical methods and concluded to a number of findings among which are :Attalkhees Alkhabeer is rich in Hadith Making Art and that such studied benifit students of Hadith Sciences. Finally, anumber of recommendations are stated such as :Researchers working on Sunnah and Hadith Making should give in their studies full attention to art of Hadith Making due to its importance and great value

2020-01-01T00:00:00Z مصطفى الأمين جاولا http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5368 2020-12-27T10:37:11Z 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z

Title: الموازنة بين كتابي تحرير تقريب التهذيب وكشف الإيهام لما تضمنه تحرير التقريب من الأوهام : دراسة تحليلية مقارنة Authors: مصطفى الأمين جاولا Abstract: The aim of this study is to shed a light on, and compare between two books, the first one is “ Tahrir Tagrib al-Tahzib” which was written on a verification and critique on Al-hafidh’s judgments on Tagrib and “Kashf Al-Eham Li_Ma Tadamanhu Tahir Al_Tagrib min Al-awham”, was written in defense of prophet’s tradition and in support of Allah’s cause then of al Hafith. I have applied the analytic and comparative descriptive and inductive methods. The study is divided into four chapters, each of which includes a number of sections, that are each divided into a number of topics. The first chapter is the essentials of the study. In the second chapter I investigated the study’s theoretical framework as regards AL-Hafith’s life, his position among other scholars, his book “ Al-Tagrib and the method he adopted therein; as well as the lives of the two other authors, their book and the method they adopted therein; in addition to the life of Mahir Al-Fahl and his book “Al-Kashf” and the method he adopted therein. The third and fourth chapters dealt with the applied framework in the form of comparing the two writers’ critique and verification of Al-Hafith’s judgments on different tradition’s narrators; besides the comment of the author of “AL-Kashf” on their comments. I have held a comparative analytical comparison with a view to arriving at the soundest and weightiest of the imams judgments concerning each of the narrator’s whose AL-Hafih’s judgments of were commented on; I have endeavored to arrive at final judgment. My approach is to identify the disputed points, AL-Hafith’s method in his “ AL-Tagrib” then looking up the narrator’s reports as mentioned in the books of Elal, Sualat and Jarh-wa-ta’adil (defects, Queries and personality’s Critique) and other musnads and majmmou’s in order to define where the narrator’s fault, error or illusion is. The conclusion gives the findings and recommendations, the most important of which is that Ibn Hajar Al-asghalani was his era’s hafith (Conner), and was a unique and miraculous scholar’s, who by excelled his contemporizes successors; and that his judgments concerning tradition narrater’s are extremely accurate and discrete; and that his book “AL-Tagrib” is one of the most important and useful concise compilation in the science of narrator’s critique (Al-Jarh Wa Al-ta’adil), and that the two authors have rashly sought to criticize and contradict his judgments in a wide range of cases without bothering to look up those issues in the specialist works, adding to that their negligence of AL-Hafith’s method in “AL-Tagrib”. They may possibly have found out points where AL-Hafith did not adhere to his own method and conditions. I ended my study with the necessary scientific indexes.

2020-01-01T00:00:00Z