<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5454">
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5454</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5463" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5462" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5461" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5460" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-10T21:14:54Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5463">
    <title>قائمة المحتويات</title>
    <link>http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5463</link>
    <description>Title: قائمة المحتويات
Authors: هيئة تحرير المجلة</description>
    <dc:date>2020-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5462">
    <title>وسائل تسوية منازعات الاستثمار الدولي وفقا لاحكام الفقه القانوني : دراسة تطبيقية على القانون السعودي</title>
    <link>http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5462</link>
    <description>Title: وسائل تسوية منازعات الاستثمار الدولي وفقا لاحكام الفقه القانوني : دراسة تطبيقية على القانون السعودي
Authors: مصعب محمد محمد أحمد</description>
    <dc:date>2020-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5461">
    <title>أحكام القبض في عقد الرهن الحيازى : دراسة قانونية مقارنة</title>
    <link>http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5461</link>
    <description>Title: أحكام القبض في عقد الرهن الحيازى : دراسة قانونية مقارنة
Authors: الطيب الزين موسى آدم
Abstract: The subject of this study concerns the provisions of receiving in the possessory mortgage contract, as a comparative study. It aims at explaining the concept of receiving in the mortgage contract, knowing how receiving is carried out in the foreclosure and the movables, and knowing the jurisprudential provisions that are pertaining to the subject of foreclosure such as :what is permissible and what is not, and to what extent it is legitimate to benefit or make use of it. I have adopted a descriptive comparative analytical approach to the legal texts and a presentation of the opinions of jurists in the jurisprudential issues related to the subject of the study followedby its discussion to reach the findings and recommendations proposed to the Sudanese legislator. This option is chosen because this subject is a complex jurisprudential issue that has many problems which are difficult to tackle such as how to receive or seize the property or movables, the rights,and obligations of equity and other matters of jurisprudence.The study also examined the concept of receiving, how it is done, and reviewed the conditions of receiving, judgment, and who is to do it, the manner in which justice is appointed and removed and its rights and duties in the contract of mortgaging. The study concluded that receiving in the property is between the mortgagor and the mortgagee and distinguishing it from other types, and enabling themortgagee putting his hand on it because receiving isonly imaginable this way. The study also concluded that the Islamic shari'a has priority in establishing the rules of the provisions of receiving in the foreclosure contract before the contemporary laws. The study also concluded that foreclosure enhances trust and achieves lofty goals for both the creditor and the debtor. It also reinforces the economy and contributes to increasing national income. Based on the above, we recommend that all the texts on the mortgage and the provisions of receiving should be put in a special law called the law of foreclosure and  that this law should  be introduced and taught  in all faculties of law, and we recommend that  receiving   should be made  a necessary condition in the mortgage contract and that   mortgageshall not be done without it.</description>
    <dc:date>2020-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5460">
    <title>المسئولية الجنائية للشاهد في القانون السوداني : دراسة مقارنة</title>
    <link>http://dspace.iua.edu.sd/handle/123456789/5460</link>
    <description>Title: المسئولية الجنائية للشاهد في القانون السوداني : دراسة مقارنة
Authors: يوسف عيسى حامد مخير; موسى محمد مصابح
Abstract: This study is entitled: The criminal responsibility of the witness on the facts witnessed by him, and the importance of this study seems to be that the certificate in the criminal field is one of the most important elements and elements of criminal justice. The purpose of this study is to clarify the criminal liability of the witness. The study also attempted to address the issue of the adequacy of the criminal and penal texts in the case of the criminal witness, as well as the facts that constitute a crime against justice and the controls that govern it.&#xD;
For this reason, this study followed the descriptive analytical approach as a comparative legal study. Based on the above, the study reached several conclusions, the most important of which is: The Sudanese Criminal Code explicitly states the crimes that are responsible for the criminal witness's responsibility, on the one hand. On the other hand, the study concluded that the responsibility of the criminal witness is an exceptional responsibility because the law discriminates against the witness from prosecution.&#xD;
The study also recommended a number of recommendations, the most important of which are: Civil society organizations play a positive role in spreading and consolidating the legal culture of the members of society so that they are aware of their rights and duties towards the provisions of the principle of rule of law. In addition, the courts shall tighten the penalty, especially in the case of the execution of the judgment against the person who is known against him under perjury.</description>
    <dc:date>2020-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

