Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: إيراد الخلاف وتوجيهه بين ابن الجوزي وابن كثير في تفسيريهم: دراسة وصفية مقارنة في الجزء الأول
Authors: محي الدين حمزة باباتندي
Keywords: تفسير القرآن الكريم
تفسير بن الجوزي
تفسير ابن كثير
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: جامعة إفريقيا العالمية
Citation: جامعة أفريقيا العالمية- عمادة الدراسات العليا والبحث العلمي والنشر- كلية القرآن الكريم - قسم التفسير وعلوم القرآن
Abstract: This study deals with the presentation and direction of the disagreement between Ibn Al-Jawzi and Ibn Katheer in their two commentaries "A comparative descriptive study in the first part", and aims to find out the type and cause of the disagreements contained in these two interpretations, and through that, the researcher has dealt with it following the inductive, analytical, descriptive and comparative methodology as required by the article. It is divided into six chapters; The first chapter deals with the basics of research to clarify the methods he took to conduct this study from the reasons for choosing the topic, the research problem, its objectives, and so on. The second chapter: deals with the previous studies related to the commentary of Ibn Al-Jawzi and Ibn Katheer, as well as what is related to the disagreement in interpretation. The third chapter deals with the biography of the two commentators Ibn al-Jawzi and Ibn Katheer, and then introduction of disagreements and its types. The fourth chapter deals with the balance between the disagreement contained in the commentaries of Ibn al-Jawzi and Ibn Katheer of verses from (48-1) in the first part of the Noble Qur’an. The fifth chapter also deals with the balance between the disagreement contained in the commentary of Ibn al-Jawzi and Ibn Katheer from (verse: 93-49) in the first part of the Holy Qur’an. It ended with the sixth chapter to balance the disagreement in the commentary of Ibn al-Jawzi and Ibn Katheer from (verse: 141-94) in th e first part of the Noble Qur’an. Among the most important findings of the researcher is that the difference in the commentary of the predecessors is a difference of diversity and not a difference of contradiction, and the reason for this is due to the union of meaning and the difference of the expression indicating it, or the difference in the representation of the general meaning, or the expression of one meaning in close terms, and its cause may be due to the possibility of words having two or more meanings that are not mutually exclusive.
Appears in Collections:أطروحات الدكتوراه

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Research.pdf6.77 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.