Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||تعقبات العلماء على ابن الجوزي في الأحاديث التي حكم بوضعها كما في كتاب تنزيه الشريعة لابن عراق: الأحاديث من كتب الحج -الجهاد و السفر - المعاملات|
|Authors:||إشراقة عبدالله محجوب|
|Publisher:||جامعة إفريقيا العالمية|
|Citation:||جامعة إفريقيا العالمية ـ عمادة الدراسات العليا والبحث العلمي والنشر ـ كلية الدراسات الإسلامية ـ قسم السنة وعلوم الحديث|
|Abstract:||This study is a project submitted by the department of Sunnah and hadith sciences and the researcher had the honor to be among the students participating in this project. This project is concerned with studying the scholar’s reactions to ibn al-jawzi in the hadiths that were judged to be based on what was mentioned in ibn arraq’s book” tanzih al-shariah”. The objectives of this study were to collect and enumerate the scholar’s tracks on ibn al-jawzi in the books (hajj – jihad – travel and muamalaat), which are 38 in number. This study included the extraction of the hadiths in question, transmission of ibn al-jawzi’s words on them and the scholar’s follow-up on them, with an expansion in the translations of the narrators whom ibn al-jawzi accused, and their hadiths judged to be fabricated, balancing between the sayings of scholars in the differing narrators with an explanation of the summary judgment on the narrator and the hadith which ibn al-jawzi judged the situation. In this study, the researcher followed: the inductive approach: by tracking and extrapolating the hadiths that are being traced, and the analytical approach: in analyzing the sayings of scholars in their traces on hadiths under study, and the comparative approach: to compare between the saying of scholars and come up with an opinion that is closer to the accuracy in judging the narrator and the hadith. In this study, the researcher pursued: numbering the hadiths according to their arrangement in the book” Tanzih al-shariah”, the hadith is mentioned in its entirety. The researcher does not translate: for flags-creedal teams- and cities and villages for summary purposes. The study included four chapters: the first is the basics of research- the second is the definition of the situation, its origins and causes, the signs of the subject hadith and the types of fabricators-the third: the definition of ibn al-jawzi and al-suyuti, and ibn al-arraq and their books and curricula in them, the fourth is a study of the scholar’s reactions to ibn al-jawzi in the hadiths that he ruled to be placed in the books(hajj)- travel- transactions) it has been found from this study that it good hadiths for others, and weak ones.|
|Appears in Collections:||أطروحات الماجستير|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.